Beyer: Triple Crown Needs Some Tweaking

Exaggerator at Pimlico prior to the 2016 Preakness. (MJC)

This comes to us via The Racing Biz – Frank Vespe, Nick Hahn & crew!

by FRANK VESPE/The Raicing Biz — September 19, 2020

This year’s Triple Crown series has been anything but typical. And that’s just fine with Andrew Beyer. Beyer, the creator of the eponymous Beyer Speed Figures carried by the Daily Racing Form as well as a successful author and former columnist for the Washington Post, appeared on Off to the Races radio Saturday morning. The weekly radio program is powered by The Racing Biz.

“I think the three-year-old racing this year has been different, but it’s been quite satisfactory,” Beyer told host Nick Hahn.

about:blank So satisfactory, in fact, that Beyer is calling for changes to the series.

“I think that the racing industry should, you know, after this season should take a look at the structure of the Triple Crown and see how we might improve it,” Beyer said.

Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Belmont Stakes was contested at about the same time of year as it normally is but at a shortened, 1 1/8-mile distance versus its typical mile-and-a-half. And, of course, the Kentucky Derby was pushed back four months from its normal “First Saturday in May” date to September 5, with the Preakness falling four weeks later, on October 3, rather than the normal two.

Those changes sit well with Beyer.

“Starting the series later in the year gave horses a chance to mature and really be ready to run top-top-notch races, as you know Tiz the Law did in the Belmont,” Beyer said. “Whereas in modern day racing, horses don’t train and race hard enough going into the Kentucky Derby to really be able to deliver, you know, maximum performances. I mean, we just haven’t seen many great Derbies, certainly from the speed figure standpoint, in a long time.”

In addition to suggesting a later start to the series, Beyer called for more time between the races, which would put them more in line with modern training methods and philosophies.

“The races, everybody agrees, are too close together,” he explained. “I mean, trainers don’t want to come back two weeks after the Derby and run in the Preakness. And, you know, reconfiguring the schedule to space the races out more would really make a lot of sense.”

Additionally, Beyer suggested that the industry should give thought to modifying the distances, especially of the Belmont.

“The distance of the Belmont, the mile-and-a-half, is really an anachronism in modern racing and I think the distances of the three races should be reconsidered,” he said.

He added, “There’s no rule that we have to do everything the way we did 50 years ago, and I think that the Triple Crown could really use some tweaking.” In the same interview, Beyer also took aim at the controversial Equibase Gmax timing system that has replaced the traditional beam system at several North American racetracks.

One Response to “Beyer: Triple Crown Needs Some Tweaking”

  1. How about shuffling into the starting gate a possible change in the Kentucky Derby qualifying season — which could have an easy to follow win-and-your-in format…….designating 18 races as such on the USA circuit, with no changes in the selection process of a European and Japanese runner. All unfilled starting gate slots due to defections and runners winning multiple win/in races are filled by total accumulated earnings in all of the qualifying races.

    Now, let’s briefly crawl into the turf weeds just a bit. The “permanent” win/in races will be the BC Juvenile and the events currently designated as 50- and 100-pointers for the winner……that is 14 total. The other four win/in races are rotated with the 21 remaining on the schedule. The “permanent” win/in races are revisited in five year cycles.

    It will be a snap for novice railbirds and the most casual sports fan to follow the action — fill in the blanks on a sheet of paper — and the second chance cash chase is math made easy for all involved.

    And how about the Kentucky Derby post position draw……seed the runners according to their accumulated earnings during the qualifying season and the top gun gets the first pick to select a starting gate slot, with a lottery-styled draw through pods following — Pod 1, 2nd to 6th place; Pod 2, 7th to 11th; Pod 3, 12th to 16th; Pod 4, 17th to 20th. The stickler is the overseas qualifying and Pod placement — if necessary — which would probably be done by a panel……think of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: